I have long thought that teaching with technology can and should be transformative. As the authors of a new book about technology in education point out, however, it is difficult for schools to incorporate new systems in truly transformative ways.
Using industry as a guide, they examine and explain how two main categories of innovation-- sustaining innovation and disruptive innovation-- have defined the the lay of the of those industries' landscape.
An example cited is the personal computer, which disrupted an industry previously the domain of manufacturers of hugh mainframes and only slightly smaller "minicomputers," none of which were designed for home use. Instead of trying to compete against established companies, Apple introduced it's IIe as something of a toy-- to users who were not in the market before. In this way, Apple made a new market out of the disruptive innovation.
Disrupting Class obviously praises American school systems for how they have responded to their customers' needs and the market's demands, but offer some guidance as to how it could incorporate disruptive innovation better.
Instead of applying a new technology into existing systems, as have done businesses to no great success, they argue that schools must find "new markets" for technology, taking on a role that nobody currently has.
For instance, instead of installing class computers to supplements what the teacher normally does, and has done for decades, a new set of computers could be used to teach a class that has never been taught, or tutor kids in a way that a teacher never could.
Given that an individual teacher has little impact on the way a school system, much less an individual school, is organized, I wonder how a teacher could use technology innovation in a disruptive way.
What are some ways we can use innovations in our own classrooms that serve "markets" that never existed before? That is, how can we use technology to fill roles that have never been filled before?